| Subject: | Re: EZY ... now going EDI-KRK |
| From: | hiddelston@yahoo.co.uk |
| Posting date: | 20-07-2007 |
| Content: | |
On Jul 20, 6:48 pm, "Callum Johnstone"
wrote:
> wrote in message
>
> news:1184873010.306974.280680@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Jul 19, 1:22 pm, Andrew Scotland wrote:
> >> On Jul 18, 6:02?pm, "Callum Johnstone"
>
> >> wrote:
> >> > "Zippy" wrote in message
>
> >> >news:1184762335.617195.175550@o11g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> > >Another smack in the face for GLA ...
> >> > >Edinburgh - Krakow 29 October Four time weekly (Mon, Wed, Fri, sat)
> >> > >?21.99
> >> > >https://www.easyjet.com/EN/News/new_routes_including_madeira.html
>
> > >" Any chance we can stop greeting very welcome new route announcements
> > as a
> >> "smack in the face"?
>
> > I don't give a monkeys and don't really see why I should jump through
> > hoops whenever EDI gets new routes as using EDI is of no use to me at
> > all.
>
> Well, that's fine, but equally there's no need for a negative reaction
> either. Perhaps a neutral reaction, or none at all would have been better.
> For some it seems to be all about wanting EDI not to have air links rather
> than wanting GLA to have them.
>
> > What I want to see is GLA getting some new routes, something which is
> > not likely to happen for a while yet by the looks of things.
>
> I want to see that too, but not to the exclusion of new routes elsewhere.
Callum it does not concern me at all if EDI get new routes - good luck
to EDI I say. What I am trying to say rather selfishly is it is of far
more interest to me what new routes LHR get as it is more likely I
shall use them due to the ease of getting there.
Last year I was looking at getting to EZE using EDI's LH service to
FRA and connecting but the logistics of lugging suitcases on public
transport to EDI and back for the sake of saving a few quid was just
not practical so when TAM started their new service to EZE via GRU
from LHR I opted for that option.
Crawford
|
