| Subject: | Re: Knowledge of Rules and Recommendations. |
| From: | "M L Wadsworth" |
| Posting date: | 09-07-2008 |
| Content: | |
"david s-a" wrote in message
news:6diuo5F2obqhU1@mid.individual.net...
>M L Wadsworth wrote:
>> "david s-a" wrote in message
>> news:6di6q8F2op28U1@mid.individual.net...
>>> M L Wadsworth wrote:
>>>> "Firstname MI Lastname" wrote in
>>>> message news:bazk5fwrzc5.fsf@alpha.luckytrout.com...
>>>>> Paul Schmitz-Josten writes:
>>>> That is only true if you ignore the Decisions.
>>>> 32-1/3 has been in existence for at least 20 years.
>>> Wot?
>>>
>>> Not 'ere it ain't.
>>>
>>> :-)
>>>
>>> david
>>
>>
>> Funny, I thought the Aussies were playing golf 20 years ago.
>>
>> All right then - at least 19 years.
>> Quote from the 1990 edition (and it was not a new Decision that year):
>> "32-1/3 Determination of Honour in Handicap Stableford Competition
>>
>> Q. In a Stableford competition the reckoning is made as in match play and
>> strokes are taken according to the handicap stroke table. If B has the
>> honour at a hole, and A and B have the same gross score at that hole but
>> A receives a handicap stroke, who has the honour at the next hole?
>>
>>
>>
>> A. A has the honour because of a better net score. "
>>
>>
>>
>> Malcolm
>>
>>
>
>
> Malcolm,
>
> Check your 2008-2009 Decisions book, D32-1/3 'sgorn!...so we haven't had
> that Decision for the last 6 8/31 months...at least! However, the
> ubiquitous 'they' sneaked the ruling into the 'Rules' as from January 1,
> this year. (Actually January 4 in Oz, 'cos they couldn't get the Rule
> books here soon enough!). See sentence added at Rule 32-1,
> CONDITIONS.....and they didn't tell anyone!
>
> So there !!!
>
> :-)
>
> cheers
> david
Thank you David, (three times thank you!!)
Malcolm
|
